Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit T'omm J'Onzz's column >>

T'OMM J'ONZZ

"the people ... still have [1½] out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad."
Articles Posted: 8  Links Seeded: 90
Member Since: 6/2009  Last Seen: 4/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Supreme Court Takes Up Arizona's Strict Immigration Law

Seeded on Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:22 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: ABC News
us-news, immigration, supreme-court, racism, arizona, alabama, law-enforcement, jan-brewer, latinos, elena-kagan, sb1070, 4th-amendment, papers-please
Seeded by T'omm J'Onzz
Advertise | AdChoices

The Supreme Court has added another hot-button issue to its docket this term, agreeing today to hear a challenge to Arizona’s strict immigration law.

The case will be argued sometime this spring, and Justice Elena Kagan will take no part in the decision, presumably because she dealt with the issue in her previous job as solicitor General of the Obama administration.

…

Arizona’s immigration law was passed in April of 2010, and was immediately challenged by the Obama administration. The administration argued that the state law interferes with existing federal law.

…

Lower courts sided with the Obama administration and blocked several key provisions of the law from going into effect.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • T'omm J'Onzz's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (4)
Mike-1499840

If the only argument is that Arizona's law interferes with Federal law...that will fly about...zero inches. In order for interference to take place, there must be some activity to interfere with. Feds ain't doing anything...ergo..No interference.

Regards,

Mike

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:49 PM EST
T'omm J'Onzz

individual states having their own immigration policies is a violation of federal authority and threatens to become a patchwork of 50 different immigration laws. people don't immigrate to Arizona or Texas or North Dakota, they immigrate to the USA; immigrating to a state is called "moving" or "relocating."

this would be like Florida adopting it's own immigration policy and chose to ignore the federal government's 'dry-foot' policy with regard to Cuban immigrants. by all accounts, immigrating from Cuba to the US is illegal -- on each country's account -- but if a Cuban makes it to shore, puts just a single foot on dry land, he or she has the right to apply for and be granted citizenship (barring any particular disqualifying attribute; e.g., criminal record.)

and speaking of that special policy for Cubans, not that i disagree with it, but why is it or should it be different for Mexicans, or any other nationality? it seems as tho having a policy which makes it illegal to discriminate based on national origin really doesn't mean much when you can keep certain nationalities from becoming citizens from the outset.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:55 PM EST
Mike-1499840

Tom,

None of the states have purported to add new policies, they are just enforcing the law on the books...pretty simple...if someone is an illegal alien, they arrest him and turn over to INS. What's the big deal? Asking folks for ID has been upheld by SCOTUS.

Regards,

Mike

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:25 PM EST
Reply
US Citizen-658112

None of the states have purported to add new policies, they are just enforcing the law on the books...pretty simple...if someone is an illegal alien, they arrest him and turn over to INS. What's the big deal? Asking folks for ID has been upheld by SCOTUS.

The Supreme Court is made up of (gulp).....lawyers.

And in the courts the side with the most money almost always wins. (Making a bet in Vegas look like a sure winner every time...).

The drug cartels side with and finance the illegal alien invasion. They have the most money. The illegal aliens have the most rights. The only question left for me is how much it will cost for the drug cartels to buy off the US Supreme Court.

    Reply#3 - Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:44 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com